Review 3 of 4
Price Paid:
$450.00
from www.adorama.com Summary: I bought this camera because I was going to be studying abroad in Germany for the year and I wanted a digital camera so that I could rapidly post pictures to share with my family and friends back in the States (turnaround tie for my photos is usually rather long, consisting of developing my slides and then scanning them, if I can find a slide scanner). Until this point my main workhorse was my Canon T90 SLR (which I was also bringing with me). I chose the Powershot S2 IS because of its lens (still a helluva pieve of glass), its resolution, and its price. I didn't want to spend more than $500, and after looking around quite a bit (Sony and Panasonic make some very, very similar models), I decided on the Canon, because I just liked the feel of it better than its rivals, which were practically identical in every other way (the lens on the Panasonic Lumix might be a little better with a constant f/2.8 aperture, but it still suffers from the same problems I will outline below). It really outshines its competitors in video modes, which I didn't think I'd use before I bought it, but I was wrong.
I also bought the 58mm lens hood/filter/lens converter adapter, as I wanted to use filters on this camera. Without a polarizing filter especially, the narrow exposure latitude of digital will result in rather paltry skies.
The camera is good and does what it was meant to, but I still find myself using it very little, instead opting for my SLR rig, simply because it gives me better control, has better optics. Bottom line, if you were looking for something to replace an SLR, this isn't it. It complements a film SLR very nicely, but it won't be your main camera. It's simply not made for that.
As for its competitors, the difference is really only in the feel (price and feature differences are negligible), so I recommend trying all of them out and picking out which one "feels" the best. Strengths: Good picture quality (at low ISO): on par with any of its competitors in this category.
Amazing zoom range: the lens on here is quite a feat of optical engineering. It's also fast throughout as well, with a f/2.7-3.4 maximum aperture.
Image Stablization: Works very well, it's a boon in low light, because you have to set the ISO so low. The camera is also light enough that it can sometimes be hard to hold steady, which is more than compensated for by the IS.
Good interface: I've always liked Canon's interface. It's easy to navigate and has the controls you need easy to find.
Has a good amouont of manual control: Aperture and Shutter-priorty, program (though not shiftable), and full manual. It has some other automatic modes, but I've never actually used them.
Has a reasonably tight spot meter: I can't live without my spot meter. Wish it was multi-spot, like my T90, but that's not even available on a lot more expensive cameras than this now.
Metering: good selection of metering (spot, centerweigheted, and evaluative/"matrix"), and flash metering, and exposure comp, and so forth.
High speed shooting: can shoot at highest fps mode until card fills up. Same for video. It'll take a while to buffer, but you can shoot until your cards fills up without pausing.
LCD: I'm willing to put up with the small LCD for the tilt and swivel. I don't really use the LCD anyway, though.
It has MF.
TAKES AA BATTERIES!!! I cannot stress how wonderful this is. Too many of my firends have had their proprietary digital camera batteries die on them, leaving them stranded. With this camera, you will almost always be able to find replacement batteries in an emergency.
Video: Didn't think I'd use it, but exceptionally good (better than competitors). High resolution and can go forever (can also take a full-res picture mid-video, though I can't figure out why this is useful) Weaknesses: Must buy the filter/lens converter/lens hood adapter seperately. Competitors come with it.
Filter adapter: using more than one filter on the filter adapter (polarizer + UV/haze, in this case) will result in vignetting at full wide angle. So will using the hood with any filters at all.
Using filter adapter will resulted in flash vignetting at almost all zoom ranges.
Noise, noise, noise: Anything above ISO 100 will result in unacceptably obvious noise. It's the same with all of its competitors, though, so I can't knoch this camera too much for it.
Lens: Lens shows exaggerated chromatic aberration away from picture center, especially in blown out highlights (which the AE system will create for you). Again, it's there in the competitors' cameras as well, and it's necessary for this kind of zoom range, but if you're a real perfectionist, you will hate the purple underlines in your white off-center highlights.
Lens: Would like it to go wider angle than 36mm (35mm equiv.) without a converter, but then again there's noticeable barrel distortion at the wide end already. The converter only makes the distortion and the chromatic aberration worse.
EVF: This is more of a knock agains the EVF system in general. EVF has some lag (though canon is better than Sony in this regard) and is simply not as good as an optical viewfinder. For this reason, this camera can never replace an SLR (though it can supplement).
Meter: meter generally overexposes scenes (at least for my taste), often highlighting hte weaknesses of the lens. Exposure comp can easily be set to counter this, however.
AF: I'm not a fan of the AF system. It can be hard to lock on to what you want, it's often a pain to change the location of the sensor, it just doesn't do what I want it to do more than I would like. To compound this, the MF is a pain to get to, and with an EVF, extremely difficult to use (must hold one button while pressing another to adjust focus). Would have much preferred a rotating barrel (a la Panasonic).
Difficult to operate with large hands, especially while wearing gloves.
Small and can be hard to hold steady (the filter adapter helps greatly with this).
Original cap came off too easily, but was not an issure for me because I use a standard thread lens cap on the filter adapter. Similar Products Used: Tried out the equivalent Sony and Panasonic, my main rig is a Canon T90, have also used AE-1, A-1, EOS-20d, EOS-300D (Digi Rebel).
|